| Review of: | Business and the Euro: Business Groups and the Politics of EMU in Germany and the United Kingdom by M.E. Duckenfield |
|---|---|
| Reviewed By: | Roger Henderson |
| Reviewed in: | Journal of Common Market Studies |
| Date accepted online: | 02/11/2007 |
| Published in print: | Volume 45, Issue 03, Pages 745-769 |
Book Reviews
European Monetary Union (EMU) has produced many conflicts between economists and politicians: improvements in economic convergence and inflation expectations compare with stalled growth and political divisions over EMU membership. The single currency is shared by only 13 EU members, excluding the UK with its concerns about electoral impacts, entry criteria and timing.
The book has a symmetrical structure: an introductory chapter that outlines the central question of why business associations in both nations pursued different EMU policies, followed by two chapters each on Germany and the UK covering respectively the politics of EMU and business. The research methodology section is brief with just a passing reference to the choice of associations and interviews and a limited theoretical framework mentioning the economic interest and collective action literatures, emphasizing that business associations are political entities themselves as well as transmitters of members' preferences.
In Germany the ruling coalition promptly encouraged moves towards EMU while business groups, benefiting from the Bundesbank's independence and the D-Mark's anchor role, engaged later in the debate. While many firms saw relatively few economic advantages, the powerful business associations, such as the
The book argues three factors influenced UK business associations' attitudes: their focus on specific, technical policies; their decentralized political organization and narrow policy evaluations; and the governing political party's prevailing stance, a factor complicated by deep divisions over Europe among both Conservative and Labour administrations. The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) was broadly supportive but reluctant to lead without political support, whereas the Institute of Directors (IOD) and Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) were more openly vociferous against integration. The London Investment Banking Association (LIBA) concentrated on technical issues, while the pro-EMU National Farmers Union (NFU) sought early entry.
It is unclear what is the intended audience for
